When Work Becomes Empty: Explaining Meaning Loss in Algorithmic Organizations

Authors

  • Agung Wahyu Ginanjar Politeknik Triguna Tasikmalaya Author

Keywords:

meaning erosion, meaningful work, algorithmic management, digital work systems, work alienation, organizational behavior

Abstract

This article addresses a growing paradox in contemporary organizations where technological advancement enhances efficiency while simultaneously diminishing employees’ sense of meaningful work. Despite extensive research on meaningful work and digital transformation, existing literature remains fragmented and lacks a process-based explanation of how meaning deteriorates over time. To bridge this theoretical gap, the study aims to develop a mechanism-driven conceptual framework that explains the dynamic process of meaning loss in algorithmic and digitally mediated work systems. Drawing on an integrative analytical approach, the article synthesizes insights from meaningful work, digital work, and organizational behavior literature to conceptualize “meaning erosion” as a cumulative and structurally embedded process. The framework identifies key mediating mechanisms, including work fragmentation, depersonalization, instrumentalization, reduced autonomy, and identity disruption, that translate structural transformations into subjective experiences of declining meaning. The study contributes theoretically by reframing meaningful work as a dynamic construct, introducing meaning erosion as a novel explanatory mechanism, and offering a unified model that connects digital transformation to human sustainability outcomes, thereby providing a foundation for future empirical testing and organizational intervention.

References

Allan, B. A., Batz-Barbarich, C., Sterling, H. M., & Tay, L. (2019). Outcomes of meaningful work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 500–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12406

Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., Shantz, A., & Soane, E. (2017). The mismanaged soul: Existential labor and the erosion of meaningful work. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.11.001

Chiaburu, D. S., Diaz, I., & de Vos, A. (2013). Employee alienation: Relationships with careerism and career satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941311284541

Duffy, R. D., Dik, B. J., Douglass, R. P., England, J. W., & Velez, B. L. (2018). Work as a calling: A theoretical model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(4), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000276

Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108

Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174

Lips-Wiersma, M., & Morris, L. (2009). Discriminating between “meaningful work” and the “management of meaning”. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 491–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0118-9

Lysova, E. I., Allan, B. A., Dik, B. J., Duffy, R. D., & Steger, M. F. (2019). Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.07.004

Martela, F., & Pessi, A. B. (2018). Significant work is about self-realization and broader purpose: Defining the key dimensions of meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00363

Meijerink, J., & Bondarouk, T. (2023). The duality of algorithmic management: Toward a research agenda on HRM algorithms, autonomy, and value creation. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100876

Michaelson, C., Pratt, M. G., Grant, A. M., & Dunn, C. P. (2014). Meaningful work: Connecting business ethics and organization studies. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1675-5

Nair, N., & Vohra, N. (2010). An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers. Management Decision, 48(4), 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011041373

Oelberger, C. R. (2019). The dark side of deeply meaningful work. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 558–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12411

Özçelik, G., & Barsade, S. G. (2018). No employee an island: Workplace loneliness and job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2343–2366. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1066

Pratt, M. G., Pradies, C., & Lepisto, D. A. (2013). Doing well, doing good, and doing with: Organizational practices for cultivating meaningful work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 33, 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2013.10.002

Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001

Steger, M. F., Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The Work and Meaning Inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160

Vallas, S. P., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857

Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616

Wrzesniewski, A., McCauley, C., Rozin, P., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Jobs, careers, and callings. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2162

Downloads

Published

2026-04-06