Value Ownership in Human–AI Co-Creation: A Multi-Level Framework of Distributed Agency and Ethical Tensions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66203/manexia.02206Keywords:
human–AI co-creation, value ownership, distributed agency, ethical paradox, value attribution, sociotechnical systemsAbstract
The increasing integration of generative artificial intelligence into creative and organizational processes challenges traditional assumptions about value creation, authorship, and ownership. In human–AI co-creation contexts, value emerges through iterative interactions between human cognition and algorithmic generation, leading to ambiguity in contribution, attribution, and ownership. Despite growing research on artificial intelligence and digital transformation, existing literature remains fragmented, lacking an integrative framework that explains how value ownership is constructed across multiple levels. This study aims to address this theoretical gap by developing a process-oriented conceptual framework that integrates perspectives from ethics, ownership theory, and co-creation. Using an integrative analytical approach, the study conceptualizes human–AI collaboration as a dynamic system characterized by distributed agency, iterative interaction loops, and multi-level value attribution mechanisms. The proposed model identifies key ethical tensions—authorship ambiguity, value attribution uncertainty, responsibility diffusion, and authenticity erosion—and positions them within an ethical paradox system. The study contributes by reconceptualizing ownership as a multi-dimensional and relational construct while providing a structured framework for analyzing how value is generated, interpreted, and allocated in human–AI systems, offering directions for future empirical research.
References
Abbott, R. (2020). The reasonable robot: Artificial intelligence and the law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108663073
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138–52160. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052
Al-Busaidi, K. A., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence and value creation: A multi-level perspective. Journal of Business Research.
Amabile, T. M. (2020). Creativity in context (Updated ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429490214
Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., García, S., Gil-López, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., Chatila, R., & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012
Benbya, H., Davenport, T. H., & Pachidi, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence in organizations: Current state and future opportunities. MIS Quarterly Executive, 20(2), 1–17.
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? FAccT Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Berente, N., Gu, B., Recker, J., & Santhanam, R. (2021). Managing artificial intelligence. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1433–1450. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/16274
Bridy, A. (2012). Coding creativity: Copyright and the artificially intelligent author. Stanford Technology Law Review, 5, 1–28.
Castelo, N., Bos, M. W., & Lehmann, D. R. (2019). Task-dependent algorithm aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(5), 809–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243719851788
Chesterman, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the limits of legal personality. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 69(4), 819–844. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589320000366
Crawford, K., & Calo, R. (2016). There is a blind spot in AI research. Nature, 538, 311–313. https://doi.org/10.1038/538311a
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., et al. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, 28(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., & Schafer, B. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Gervais, D. J. (2020). The machine as author. Iowa Law Review, 105, 2053–2096.
Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence. Academy of Management Review, 45(3), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0139
Haefner, N., Wincent, J., Parida, V., & Gassmann, O. (2021). Artificial intelligence and innovation management. R&D Management, 51(3), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12467
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 61–69.
Longoni, C., Bonezzi, A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2019). Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz013
Logg, J. M., Minson, J. A., & Moore, D. A. (2019). Algorithm appreciation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005
Mittelstadt, B. D. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4
Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A. (2020). From what to how. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2141–2168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00236-5
Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12244
Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.003
Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production. Social Media + Society, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118769394
Oh, K. J., Lee, D., Ko, B., & Choi, H. J. (2018). A chatbot for psychiatric counseling. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 379–387.
Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2017). Platform revolution. W.W. Norton.
Rai, A. (2020). Explainable AI. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00707-0
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0188
Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., & Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap. FAT Conference.
Ryan, M., & Stahl, B. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines. AI & Society, 35, 61–72.
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.
Tredinnick, L., & Laybats, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence and professional roles. Journal of Documentation.
Weidinger, L., Mellor, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Uesato, J., Huang, P. S., Cheng, M., Glaese, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., et al. (2021). Ethical and social risks of AI. arXiv.
Wu, L., Brynjolfsson, E., & Rock, D. (2021). AI and the future of work. Harvard Business Review.
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Richard Abdulloh Mundzir, Rohimat Nurhasan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal applies the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
