Digital Interoperability and the Reconfiguration of Regional Coordination: A Mechanism-Based Perspective from Emerging Platform Economies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66203/manexia.01305

Keywords:

digital interoperability, regional coordination, transaction cost economics, institutional substitution, emerging platform economies

Abstract

Digital interoperability has emerged as a defining feature of contemporary regional digital economies, yet its role in reshaping cross-border coordination remains under-theorized. While prior research emphasizes regulatory harmonization or platform governance within domestic markets, less attention has been devoted to how interoperable infrastructures reorganize regional coordination in the absence of supranational authority. This article develops a mechanism-based conceptual framework explaining how digital interoperability reconfigures regional institutional alignment in emerging platform economies. Integrating Transaction Cost Economics, ecosystem boundary theory, and regional coordination scholarship, the study identifies four interrelated mechanisms: transaction cost compression, institutional substitution, ecosystem boundary expansion, and coordinated decentralization. Together, these mechanisms demonstrate how infrastructural synchronization can stabilize cross-border exchange without requiring political integration. The framework advances a configurational perspective, arguing that interoperability produces distinct regional outcomes depending on the degree of institutional fragmentation. By reframing interoperability as infrastructural governance rather than technical compatibility, this study contributes to strategy and institutional scholarship and offers a bounded explanation of how digital economies integrate under fragmented governance conditions.

References

Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451

Cennamo, C. (2021). Competing in digital markets: A platform-based perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(2), 265–291. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2019.0038

Chen, L., Wu, J., & Zhong, J. (2023). Digital governance and organizational boundaries under platform complexity. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/[DOI to be verified]

Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.

Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Organization, 73(1), 42–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818318000407

Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904

Kapoor, R. (2020). Ecosystems: Broadening the locus of value creation. Journal of Organization Design, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-020-00068-9

Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.

Mattli, W. (1999). The logic of regional integration: Europe and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Tiwana, A. (2014). Platform ecosystems: Aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. Morgan Kaufmann.

Verbeke, A., & Hutzschenreuter, T. (2021). The future of international business research on corporate globalization that never was. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(9), 1619–1631. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00459-2

Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press.

Downloads

Published

08-09-2025