Peer-Review Process

Econovia: Journal of Economic Strategy and Development applies a double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and academic rigor of published manuscripts. The identities of authors and reviewers are concealed throughout the evaluation process to maintain objectivity and fairness.

Initial Editorial Screening

All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial assessment by the Editorial Team to evaluate scope alignment with the journal, methodological soundness, originality (including plagiarism screening), and compliance with author guidelines. Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be rejected without external review.

Double-Blind Review Procedure

Each manuscript passing the initial screening is assigned to at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise in economics, development studies, or public policy. Reviewers evaluate theoretical contribution, analytical rigor, methodological quality, policy relevance, and clarity of argumentation. Detailed comments and recommendations are provided to support editorial decision-making.

Editorial Decision Flow

• Accept without revision
• Minor revision
• Major revision
• Reject

Authors are expected to submit revised manuscripts within the timeframe specified by the editorial office.

Reviewer Ethics and Responsibilities

Reviewers must maintain confidentiality of submitted manuscripts, provide objective and constructive feedback, declare any potential conflicts of interest, and avoid using unpublished material for personal research purposes. The journal adheres to internationally recognized ethical standards in peer review practices.

Final Acceptance and Publication

After revisions are completed and approved, manuscripts proceed to copyediting, layout editing, and final publication through the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform.