Manuscript Template

Publishing high-quality research requires clarity, structure, and analytical discipline. To assist authors in preparing manuscripts efficiently and consistently, the journal provides an official manuscript template.

The template is designed to ensure formatting consistency, structural coherence, and analytical clarity across all types of manuscripts, including empirical studies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed-method), literature reviews, conceptual analyses, and policy-oriented papers.

Download the Official Manuscript Template

Please download and use the latest version of the manuscript template below:

Download Manuscript Template (.docx)

Additional Writing and Presentation Guidelines

Structural Flexibility

The journal does not require strict adherence to a rigid IMRAD structure. Section titles do not need to be labeled strictly as Methods, Results, or Discussion. Authors may organize sections according to the logic and nature of their study.

However, the headings INTRODUCTION and CONCLUSION must remain unchanged. The structure should demonstrate a clear progression of ideas and alignment between objectives, analysis, and conclusions.

Use of Bullet Points

Bullet points are permitted. However, authors are encouraged to minimize their use whenever possible. Core arguments, explanations, and interpretations should primarily be developed through well-structured analytical paragraphs to preserve intellectual depth and coherence.

Figures and Tables

Each manuscript should include at least one figure and one table to enhance clarity and explanation.

Figures and tables must serve analytical purposes. They should clarify findings, summarize frameworks or themes, present data in a more accessible form, and strengthen interpretation. Decorative, redundant, or purely illustrative visuals are not acceptable. Visual elements must add explanatory value rather than repeat textual descriptions.

Presentation of Large Evidence

If the research includes extensive statistical outputs, detailed regression tables, coding matrices, interview transcripts, or other substantial evidentiary materials, authors may attach them as appendices or supplementary files.

However, within the main manuscript, findings must be presented in simplified and reader-friendly visualizations or summaries. The objective is to ensure that readers can easily grasp the core insights without being overwhelmed by raw technical output. Clarity for the reader is a priority.

Reference Policy

The reference list does not need to be excessive in number. Authors should avoid over-citation or including references that do not directly strengthen the discussion.

References must be relevant, necessary, and substantively supportive of the analysis. Quality and relevance of citations are prioritized over quantity.

Clarity strengthens credibility. Strong structure strengthens contribution.