Algorithmic Integration Boundaries: Rethinking the Theory of the Firm in Platform Ecosystems
Keywords:
theory of the firm, organizational boundaries, algorithmic governance, digital platform ecosystems, dynamic capabilities, artificial intelligenceAbstract
The theory of the firm has long assumed alignment between ownership, coordination authority, and capability execution, conceptualizing firm boundaries as governance solutions that internalize control when markets become inefficient. The diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructures within platform ecosystems destabilizes this alignment by relocating decision-relevant intelligence beyond formal ownership domains. Firms increasingly embed externally governed algorithmic systems into pricing, forecasting, visibility management, and workflow coordination, allowing coordination and monitoring to occur without asset transfer or hierarchical integration. This article reconceptualizes firm boundaries as algorithmic integration boundaries defined by infrastructural control over coordination and learning processes. A mechanism-based framework identifies four cumulative processes driving boundary reconfiguration: data dependency intensification, workflow embedding, algorithmic visibility and control redistribution, and capability redistribution. Together, these mechanisms produce algorithmic boundary permeability, a condition in which legal ownership persists while effective coordination authority and adaptive capacity extend into externally governed infrastructures. This reconceptualization refines boundary theory, extends resource-based and dynamic capability perspectives through the notion of infrastructure-dependent capabilities, and identifies algorithmic mediation as a structural source of interorganizational power asymmetry.
References
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Cennamo, C. (2021). Competing in digital markets: A platform-based perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(2), 265–291. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0040
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1086/261404
Gulati, R., & Sytch, M. (2007). Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer’s performance in procurement relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 32–69. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.32
Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1990). Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1119–1158. https://doi.org/10.1086/261729
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(2), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219857360
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Organization Science, 32(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1376
Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619862257
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press.