Data Extractivism and Strategic Value Appropriation: Rethinking Firm Advantage in AI-Centric SME Ecosystems
Keywords:
data extractivism, SME strategy, value appropriation, digital platform ecosystems, artificial intelligence governance, architecture-based competitive advantageAbstract
Artificial intelligence–enabled platforms are transforming the foundations of competitive advantage in digital market ecosystems. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) generate substantial transactional and behavioral data through platform participation, yet control over data aggregation and model-training architectures typically resides with platform sponsors. This structural decoupling challenges the core assumption of the resource-based view that ownership and control of valuable resources ensure rent appropriation. Integrating resource-based theory, value appropriation logic, data-enabled learning research, and platform governance scholarship, this article develops a conceptual framework explaining how data extractivism operates as an architecture-mediated mechanism of value capture. The model argues that competitive advantage in AI-centric ecosystems increasingly derives from control over aggregation infrastructures rather than localized data generation. Cross-SME data pooling produces compounding learning rents that disproportionately accrue to actors controlling centralized architectures, especially under conditions of high switching costs, limited data portability, and governance opacity. By reframing advantage as architecture-dependent, the study extends strategic management theory and clarifies how SME performance becomes ecosystem-conditioned in AI-driven markets.
References
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Brandenburger, A. M., & Stuart, H. W. (1996). Value‐based business strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 5(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1996.00005.x
Chen, Y., Pereira, I., & Patel, P. C. (2022). Decentralized governance of digital platforms. Organization Science, 33(6), 2223–2244. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1594
Gawer, A. (2021). Digital platforms and ecosystems: Remarks on the dominant organizational forms of the digital age. Innovation: Organization & Management, 23(1), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2020.1857362
Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2020). When data creates competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 98(1), 94–101.
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
Kretschmer, T., Leiponen, A., Schilling, M., & Vasudeva, G. (2022). Platform ecosystems as meta-organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3250
OECD. (2024). Data portability, interoperability and competition in digital markets. OECD Publishing.
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022